Is what Epic is looking for in App Stores What else do game developers Really Need? -

As mobile game and app developers scream to the sky in protest of the duopoly tax of 30% that players pay on nearly all revenue from mobile games worldwide, Epic Games has emerged as the leading gaming company fighting to open computing on mobile devices.

privately asked large and small studios for games on what they'd like to see, and the following is what they stated they were interested in knowing.

Background Introduction: The Slow Decline of Open Computing as well as the App Tax of 30%

The world of computing has never been more flexible than today. The past was when the developers of video games and software depended on open computing with PC as well as Mac platforms as it allowed creators to make titles whenever they wanted, have direct contact to their users and pick payment methods that worked for the game. There were no gatekeepers -all you needed was a computer and an individual player or game. The world has changed.

Today, over half of the time spent on screens for computing is done on smartphones -- and this has been increasing. Moreover, more than 100 percent of the market share are split between Apple or Google. Thanks to this domination on mobile market share and related restrictions on distribution of games and ecommerce, the world that is open to computing in danger greater than it ever was before, and is costing a lot to consumers as well as app and game developers.

In both instances, Google as well as Apple's app stores enforce the 30% fee for purchases made by games and related products that are sold through their platforms. Apple is in control of 100 percent of distribution of games and online commerce through iOS devices. However, Google lets OEM market applications as well as loading games on mobile devices with sideloading, however it limits third-party gaming payment only to games offered through Google Play.

Google Play does offer a payment integration service that allows third-party companies for a small number of game developers by way of its " user choice billing" test. However "user choice billing" has high evergreen marketplace fees that range from 26% to 36%, even if you use your own payment service provider. You assume all the risks and responsibility of payment.

The effect of Apple as well as Google's control of a huge share of computing worldwide is that you pay a 30% tax that is imposed on mobile games and apps. This tax, being paid by players. It and is not paid to game designers and hinders the free use of computing and the e-commerce. Due to this stranglehold in open computing, both gamers and small are convinced that it's an appropriate time to alter their behavior.

What are the Game Designers who aren't Epic

Our team set off on a journey of a month to speak with game studios both large and small on the things they would like to see happen in the guidelines for mobile applications. Though not all agreed on each aspect but these three are the top things they told us they would prefer to see

1. iOS to support sideloading games with no scare screens.

iOS has long restricted "sideloading" games and applications that are downloaded from outside the App Store. It is downloaded through the official website of the creator or another market. The sideloading feature allows users to purchase games and developers to market and distribute games in any way they want and that the user is ready to adhere to. Android permits sideloading apps and games, however it does so in conjunction with a series of ineffective warnings by the name of "scare screens" that inform mobile phone owners about the dangers that come with "downloading applications from the internet." Many of the game designers we talked to believed that Apple would be able to allow sideloading and that Apple as well as Google ought to stay clear of over-the-top self-serving scare screens that disparage software distribution beyond their storefronts for apps.

2. You can allow unlimited "steering" as well as embedded payments via third-party payment platforms.

Both Google as well as Apple restrict the ability to display prices and purchase options that are offered by third-party payment services in addition to the app store. Similar items may be offered at cheaper prices for the player, but game makers cannot direct their players toward those alternatives, or link to additional purchases, or incorporate the experience offered by third parties within their game. Though many of the game designers we talked with found great value in transactions through apps, the preferred option was to allow players and developers the ability to eliminate steering or embedded restrictions on payment.

3. Costs are 0% for steering and embedded payments.

The ability to allow control and embedded payments is one thing. However, as we've seen with Google's "user option billing" pilot, the ability to perform things and the motivation to do the thing are two separate aspects. The pilot was "user preference billing" boasts a staggering $26 cost for transactions made through third-party payment services, when combined with the fees they charge it is a no-cost benefit for a majority of game developers. Game developers that we spoke to thought that zero was an adequate cut to cover transactions not in the app store. However they were all on board with a certain type or financial incentive for app stores that could help to boost the download and playability of games. However that a cut of 26% of each transaction that is made by a third-party is way beyond what they believed would be fair.

What's next?

There are numerous other specific, nuanced desires about how applications function that game developers would like to see, those three needs are the core of what they believe would drive true transformation in open computing that is suitable for mobile devices.

About

David Nachman David is CEO of , a trusted complete-service partner in e-commerce for software firms. David is in charge of managing its growth and expanding the company's already impressive expertise to provide industry-leading e-commerce solutions for the fast-growing marketplace of software. In the past 20 many years David has been in posts ranging from functional vice president to CEO in high-growth businesses like Vision, Velocify, and HireRight.

Article was first seen on here